Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1380MHz vs 1215MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 384.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +1%
14.31 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
80
5888
Shading Units
5120
184
TMUs
320
96
ROPs
128
184
Tensor Cores
640
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Volta
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.0
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy