Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
7152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 +90861%
23.65 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1050 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
640.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
2
7168
Shading Units
16
224
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

158.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
23.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
369.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
10W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy