NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1550MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
5.468 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+306%
22.22 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
7168
64
TMUs
448
32
ROPs
0
64
Tensor Cores
448
16
RT Cores
56
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
204 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
100 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
