Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded +5423%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
4
2048
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy