NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1335MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 30W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+533%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
