Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 20W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded +23673%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
12W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy