NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1770MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000
+198%
16.31 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A500 Embedded
2628
Quadro RTX 8000
+416%
13586
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
72
2048
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
64
Tensor Cores
576
16
RT Cores
72
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
