Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1537MHz
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Mobile
6.296 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +119%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

832 MHz
Base Clock
-
1537 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
7680
64
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
120
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

73.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
98.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
6.296 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
6.296 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
98.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy