Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1700MHz vs 1537MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
11264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Mobile
6.296 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +618%
45.26 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2021
Ampere-MW
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

832 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1537 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
13312
64
TMUs
832
32
ROPs
0
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

49.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
98.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
6.296 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
6.296 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
98.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net