Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q +3797%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

585 MHz
Base Clock
-
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

58
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
7424
Shading Units
192
232
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy