Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
7392 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q +27825%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

585 MHz
Base Clock
-
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

58
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
7424
Shading Units
32
232
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy