Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q +3170%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

585 MHz
Base Clock
-
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

58
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7424
Shading Units
384
232
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy