Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1785MHz vs 1500MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile +509%
22.27 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
16
7424
Shading Units
1024
232
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy