Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile +2066%
22.27 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
14
7424
Shading Units
448
232
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy