NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile
+1571%
22.27 TFLOPS
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
16
7424
Shading Units
512
232
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
48
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
3 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
