Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
10720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A6000 +48287%
38.71 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
84
SM Count
4
10752
Shading Units
32
336
TMUs
16
112
ROPs
8
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy