NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 vs AMD FirePro W5000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 96GB VRAM RTX PRO 6000 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2407MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
23296 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX PRO 6000
+9039%
115.8 TFLOPS
FirePro W5000
1.267 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2025
Release Date
Aug 2012
Blackwell PRO
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2017 MHz
Base Clock
-
2407 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
96GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR7
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.79TB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
188
SM Count
-
24064
Shading Units
768
752
TMUs
48
176
ROPs
32
752
Tensor Cores
-
188
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
423.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
1810 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
115.8 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
115.8 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
1.810 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
600W
TDP
75W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GB202
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Blackwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
92.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
750 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
10.1
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
