Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Google Tensor G5
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2400MHz Samsung Exynos 1380 vs. 8 cores 3400MHz Google Tensor G5 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
Google Tensor G5 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (1.536 TFLOPS vs 0.608 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (3400MHz vs 2400MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 5nm)
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
Samsung Exynos 1380
594469
Google Tensor G5
+143%
1445942
FP32 (float)
Samsung Exynos 1380
0.608 TFLOPS
Google Tensor G5
+152%
1.536 TFLOPS
AnTuTu 9
CPU
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X4
5x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A525
2400 MHz
Frequency
3400 MHz
8
Cores
8
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
-
-
-
-
0
L3 cache
-
5 nm
Process
3 nm
-
-
-
5 W
TDP
-
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Graphics
Mali-G68 MP5
GPU name
-
950 MHz
GPU frequency
1100 MHz
5
Execution units
-
-
-
-
8
Max size
16
0.608 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS
1.3
Vulkan version
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
-
-
-
Memory
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
-
4x 16 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit
51.2 Gbit/s
Max bandwidth
-
AI
-
-
-
-
-
-
Multimedia (ISP)
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
3840 x 2400
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
-
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
-
-
-
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
Yes
Up to 3790 Mbps
Download speed
-
Up to 1280 Mbps
Upload speed
-
6
Wi-Fi
7
5.3
Bluetooth
5.4
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Info
Feb 2023
Announced
Aug 2025
Mid range
Class
Flagship
S5E8835
Model number
-
