NVIDIA T1000 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T1000 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T1000
+7712%
2.5 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Turing
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
40
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
