NVIDIA T400 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 30W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
+1267%
1.094 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
80
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
17W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
