Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1440MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +843%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
56
384
Shading Units
3584
24
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy