Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

NVIDIA T400 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition +162%
2.867 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy