Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T600 vs ATI FirePro V8700

NVIDIA T600 vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T600 +42%
1.709 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
10
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
800
40
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
53.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
3.418 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.709 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
53.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
151W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy