Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050 +2236%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GT218
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

238W
TDP
28W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy