NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (130W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
+215%
1.028 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2013
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
130W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
