NVIDIA Tesla C2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
+36%
1.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
640
56
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
