Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q +71%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2013
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy