Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090 +254%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy