Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800 +3261%
44.78 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2023
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2499 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
70
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
4480
64
TMUs
280
48
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
70
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
319.9 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
699.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.56 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.78 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1399 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
260W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy