Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
Lower TDP (47W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c +86%
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Tesla K20c +71%
55
Quadro P1000
32
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
2496
Shading Units
640
208
TMUs
40
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
47W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GP107
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy