Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile +3%
3.656 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2496
Shading Units
1024
208
TMUs
64
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
TU117
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net