Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
11584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +1258%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Nov 2021
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
320bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
2496
Shading Units
14080
208
TMUs
880
40
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy