Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 211.6GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000 +8%
4.252 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla K20Xm +12%
372
Quadro M5000
332
OctaneBench
Tesla K20Xm
63
Quadro M5000 +38%
87
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
861 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2688
Shading Units
2048
224
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy