Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K40c vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Tesla K40c vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K40c 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (1480MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 245W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K40c +66%
5.046 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

745 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
2880
Shading Units
1024
240
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

245W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK180
GPU Name
GP106
GK180-890-A1
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy