Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K40m 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1124MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (68W vs 245W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K40m +250%
5.046 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Tesla K40m +100%
68
Quadro K2200
34
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

745 MHz
Base Clock
1046 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
640
240
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

245W
TDP
68W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy