Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Tesla K40m vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K40m 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 84% (1612MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 245W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K40m
5.046 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +63%
8.253 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Tesla K40m
68
RTX A2000 Embedded +236%
229
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

745 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
2880
Shading Units
2560
240
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GA107S
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

245W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy