Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

NVIDIA Tesla M2050
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P600
NVIDIA Tesla M2050
NVIDIA Quadro P600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
Quadro P600 +16%
1.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1329 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
3
448
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
32.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
1030 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
515.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
40W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GP107
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy