CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
VS
NVIDIA Tesla M2075
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+288%
3.994 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075
VS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
Tesla
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
DG2-128
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Board Design
225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
2
NVIDIA Quadro 7000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
3
NVIDIA Tesla K40s vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
4
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
5
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
6
AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
7
NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
8
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
9
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
10
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA GRID K140Q
Related News
1
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
2
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
3
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
4
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
5
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
6
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
7
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
8
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
9
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
10
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy