Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (41W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075 +205%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.504 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.4 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
14.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
41W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK107
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy