Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Tesla M6 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M6 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1180MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M6 +102%
3.625 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1180 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
768
96
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

75.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
113.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.625 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
113.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GM206
GM204-995-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy