Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q +709%
5.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1139 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
240
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

800W
TDP
75W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy