NVIDIA Tesla T10 16 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla T10 16 GB and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla T10 16 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (2250MHz vs 1395MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 403.2GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla T10 16 GB
9.999 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+130%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Mar 2023
Tesla Turing
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
403.2GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
40
3584
Shading Units
5120
224
TMUs
160
64
ROPs
64
448
Tensor Cores
160
56
RT Cores
40
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
AD104
TU102-890-KCD-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
