Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Tesla T40 24 GB and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 624.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla T40 24 GB
14.38 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla Turing
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
1305 MHz
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
624.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
72
4608
Shading Units
4608
288
TMUs
288
96
ROPs
96
576
Tensor Cores
576
72
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
260W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy