Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB +960%
14.13 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1245 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
876 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
897.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
16
5120
Shading Units
512
320
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
48
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
3 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy