Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 897.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB +6%
15.67 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2018
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1290 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
876 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
897.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
8192
320
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
128
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy