NVIDIA Tesla X2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2070 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla X2070 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla X2070
+406%
1.166 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
12
448
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
18.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
36.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1166 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
582.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
134W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
G80
GF100-876-A3
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
