Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 32GB VRAM Quadro GV100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (868.4GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro GV100 +1150%
16.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Volta
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1132 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
848 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
868.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
80
512
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
48
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
208.3 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
520.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.32 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.66 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.330 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
GV100-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy