Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs Intel Arc A310

NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (2520MHz vs 1750MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
17664 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada +3356%
92.9 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 40
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1152GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
768
576
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
96
144
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

800W
TDP
30W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
DG2-128
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy