NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
17920 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+15030%
92.9 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
512
576
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
75W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Cayman
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
