NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs ATI FirePro V9800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
16832 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+3315%
92.9 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
1600
576
TMUs
80
192
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
250W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Cypress
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
